性、伦理、禁忌--_--《金瓶梅》及《洛丽塔》的比较.pdf

　　摘 要

　　本文以《金瓶梅》与《洛丽塔》经历了禁与局部解禁、再晋身于文学经典之

　　列的历史，从厘清两书作者生平、成书背景、小说传世经历等问题入手，从色情与

　　乱伦、伦理与禁忌的存在悖论进入《金瓶梅》与《洛丽塔》的比较研究。《金瓶梅》

　　与《洛丽塔》揭露了肉欲与乱伦的禁忌，又遭到禁忌反对，最后又在一定程度上

　　臣服于禁忌，本文试图以此去发现并澄清与禁忌、伦理、色情、乱伦相关的文学

　　问题，并进一步指出色情与乱伦是人类历史上永不凋零的“恶之花”。由《金瓶梅》

　　与《洛丽塔》作者生平身份的比较，再由其流传及出版的相似命运，可以看出《金

　　瓶梅》、《洛丽塔》如何与禁忌相关，其被禁、被删、被谴责的过程，恰好就是禁

　　忌生成的过程。在性禁忌的背后，是伦理的禁忌，《金瓶梅》与《洛丽塔》分别披

　　上冒犯性禁忌的外衣，行着冒犯伦理的事情（包括世俗伦理、身体伦理等），以一

　　种隐匿的方式陈述人类的罪欲。《金瓶梅》与《洛丽塔》所揭示的问题，是人类永

　　恒的问题。《金瓶梅》与《洛丽塔》既是女性的悲剧史，也是人类的悲剧史。它们

　　分别冒犯人类禁忌，但又不同程度为人类禁忌与人类文明作出了辩护。《金瓶梅》

　　与《洛丽塔》最终成为文学史上的经典。但我们仍然可以看到它们也是禁忌下的产

　　物、固有秩序下的产物，艺术为它们提供了避难所。禁忌永远比我们的想象要强大

　　坚韧，而冒犯禁忌也成为一种文学原创的动力。

　　关键词：金瓶梅 洛丽塔 性 色情 乱伦 伦理 禁忌

　　I

　　Abstract

　　From their historical similarities of the two books, Jin Ping Mei and Lolita, which

　　were firstly suffered from prohibition, then lifted the ban locally and finally promoted to

　　the literature sutra, and, on the basis of clearing up the two authors' lifetime, writing

　　background and the handed down experience of the two novels, this paper carries its

　　comparative research on the two novels from the paradox of the existence of eroticism,

　　fornication, ethic and taboos.

　　Jin Ping Mei and Lolita revealed the taboos of fleshliness and fornication, which

　　were prohibited by the taboos and finally somewhat subjected to the taboos. This paper

　　tries to find out and clarify the relevant literature issues about taboos, ethic, eroticism

　　and fornication to get the conclusion of that eroticism and fornication is the ever

　　blossom "flower of evil".

　　By the comparison of the authors' lifetime status and the books' similar destiny of

　　spreading and publication, one can tell how Jin Ping Mei and Lolita were related to the

　　taboos. The process of being prohibited, being deleted and being reprimanded is exactly

　　the process of the